×

RSS SiteGround Blog

Members

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Search

SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR PASSWORD?

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

AAH, WAIT, I REMEMBER NOW!

Elite Court Reporting Agency

  • SUPPORT
  • LOGIN
  • About Us
  • Services
    • Legal Videography
    • Legal Videoconferencing Service
    • National Court Reporting/ Litigation Services
    • Cincinnati Court Reporting
    • Indianapolis Court Reporting
    • Louisville Court Reporting
    • Lexington Court Reporting
    • Dayton Court Reporting
    • Cleveland Court Reporting
    • Columbus Court Reporting
  • Scheduling
  • Repository
  • Careers
    • Networking Opportunities
  • Court Reporting News
  • Contact

Ireland’s Attorney General Argues for Review of Defamation Law to Protect Court Reporters

by Chief / Tuesday, 19 January 2016 / Published in Cincinnati Court Reporting, Court Reporters

court reportersCourt reporting services have been around since basically the start of formal judicial systems. Court reporters play a vital role in the integrity, reliability, and overall outcome of legal proceedings. In the U.S. there were 21,200 court reporters as of 2012, with employment estimated to grow 10% by 2022. In Ireland that trend could be going the other direction if changes aren’t made.

Attorney General of Ireland, Maire Whelan, has seen enough evidence of a possible “chilling” effect in regards to court reporting that she’s asked for a review of the country’s defamation laws. In front of a large gathering of judges and lawyers at the Four Courts, Whelan argued that reform is essential to preserve the level and quality of court reporting people expect.

“One of the most challenging assignments in journalism in the State must be that of court reporter; subject to very tight deadlines, endeavoring to assimilate complex and involved details and present them in a clear, accessible and coherent fashion whilst getting names and titles correct,” Whelan said. “Court reporters by their work execute this important constitutional value and thereby serve the public interest.”

Unfortunately, as Whelan went on to point out, court reporters in their country live in constant fear of small oversights, omissions, or errors that could jeopardize their career and entire livelihood. According to Whelan, there should at least be some debate as to whether the standard for such a defamation case should require actual proof of malice intent.

In the U.S., the minimum speed needed to become certified by the National Court Reporters Association (NCRA) is 225 words per minute. Ireland’s presumably follows a similar standard, which when you’re dealing at that rapid a rate opens the door to potential mistakes.

Justice Nicholas Kearns did however warn about the risks of making decisions that decrease accountability and could have unintended consequences down the road:

“They [courts] should never put themselves in the position of realizing, all too late, that a particular decision has opened a Pandora’s Box of unintended consequences which, had proper consideration been applied at the relevant time, might have led to a different approach being taken.”

  • Tweet

About Chief

What you can read next

court reporting
Why Court Reporting is So Important
Missing Court Transcripts Present Huge Legal Problems
National Court Reporting
Litigation Support Services

Elite Court Reporting Agency
Serving All 50 States
513.233.3000

This site is managed by JEM

     
The Cincinnati Bar
Association

Managed by JEM

  • GET SOCIAL
TOP